The supervisor of doctor accused person shall be responsible for performing on doctor findings of doctor investigator and shall check with doctor acceptable School of Medicine administrative officers adding doctor Dean and Provost of doctor School of Medicine, doctor appropriate Associate Dean, and doctor Affirmative Action Office regarding formal disciplinary actions clinical be taken against doctor accused person. Decisions concerning appropriate disciplinary action shall be made in keeping with relevant University and School of Medicine guidelines and approaches with attention of correctly centered information of past behavior and doctor seriousness of doctor violation. The supervisor might also review any a part of doctor investigative facts scientific assist in doctor resolution making task. Within ten 10 industrial days of receiving doctor investigators findings, doctor manager shall meet with doctor accused person scientific discuss doctor findings and proposals and shall determine acceptable disciplinary action. Appropriate discipline may range from an oral reprimand up clinical and adding termination/dismissal for cause or every other appropriate remedial action. The accused person, doctor investigator, and doctor Affirmative Action Office if not doctor investigator can be notified in writing of doctor action taken by doctor supervisor. Medical Malpractice| doctor Good, doctor Bad, doctor Ugly| | | | | doctor effects of medical malpractice lie in doctor following rationalization of views, referred scientific as the best, doctor bad, and doctor ugly. clinical help paper adds a presentation of facts of doctor two maximum single incident medical malpractice court cases in Connecticut: Daniel Jacob DAttilo et al. v. Richard Viscarello et al. Case 1 and Elizabeth Oram and Simon Oram as Parents and Next Friends of Spencer Oram at al. v.